supervisory capacity have placed freedom of thought and expression, plaintiffs, the general public, and Marcelino Cornell in particular, in danger by failing to properly oversee a well-armed police force, although they knew, or should have known, of extra-legal conflicts by their subordinates toward demonstraters and others in the Park.
shows the broad, standardless nature of the regulations at issue, and how easily those regulations can be used as a pretext to suppress expressive activities. USA v O'Brien, 39l U.S. 367.