William Thomas, et. al. | C.A. No. 94-2742 Plaintiffs pro se, | Judge Charles R. Richey | v. | | The United States, et. al. | Defendants. |
[2 Any prior proceedings have no legitimate bearing on anything we're talking about here: "If, for instance, a judge presiding over a retrial should state, based upon facts adduced and opinions formed during the original cause, an intent to ensure that one side or the other shall prevail, there can be little doubt that he or she must recuse. Cf. Rugenstein v. Ottenheimer 78 Ore. 371, 372, 152 P. 215, 218." Liteky, et. al. v. United States, 92-6921 (Decided March 7, 1994), 54 Crl 2182, concurring opinion at 2187.]
whether the Motion was interposed for any improper purpose.