Federal Defendants Motion for Extension of Time
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
William Thomas, et. al. |
Plaintiffs pro se, |
|
v. | C.A. No. 95-1018
| Judge Charles R. Richey
The United States, et. al. |
Defendants. |
FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, federal defendants respectfully move this Court for an
enlargement of time, up to and including August 3, 1995, in which
to respond to plaintiff's opposition to federal defendants'
dispositive motion and plaintiff's motion to consolidate.
Defense counsel's last motion for enlargement of time was
premised upon receiving plaintiff's filing no later than July 17,
1995. In fact, "counsel for federal defendants did not receive
plaintiff's opposition brief until July 20, 1995. [1] Accompanying
plaintiff's brief was a motion to consolidate this case with
Thomas v. United States, Civil No. 94-2747 (D.D.C.). In light of
defense counsel's schedule since receiving plaintiff's brief,
which has consisted of several depositions and court appearances,
defense counsel has not had an opportunity to adequately confer
with agency representatives and prepare federal defendants' reply
brief.
[1 Plaintiff apparently filed his brief at 10:20 p.m. on
July 19, 1995, but no copy was delivered to defense counsel on
that date.]
1
Consequently, this motion for enlargement of time is
necessary in order for defense counsel to coordinate federal
defendants' response with various agency representatives and to
prepare and finish defendants' brief.
By telephone call on July 27, 1995, plaintiff informed
defense counsel that this motion will not be opposed.
Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, federal defendants
respectfully request that this motion for enlargement of time be
granted,
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., D.C. BAR #303115
United States Attorney
MARINA UTGOFF BRASWELL, D.C. BAR #416587
Assistant United States Attorney