Had it not been for the misdelivery of appellees' Motions by the Post Office this
Opposition, and the Opposition filed on November 27. 1995 in Thomas I, would
1
have been filed within the limits, and more carefully written.
Appellant regrets being unable to research, read, think, and write fast enough to
have completed Opposition in both cases within the time limits. That not being the
case, appellant can only request that this honorable Court consider the misdelivery of
appellees' motion a mistake for which appellant should not be penalized, and permit
appellant to file the instant Opposition outside the proscribed time limit.
Respectfully submitted,
William Thomas, appellant, pro se.
Appellant, pro se
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, D.C. 20038
202-462-0757
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Motion to File Outside the Time
Limit an Opposition to Appellees' Motion for Summary Affirmance has been mailed,
postage prepaid, this 29th day of November 1995, to
Marina Utgoff Braswell
Assistant United States Attorney
Judiciary Center Building
555 4th Street N.W., Rm 10-820
Washington, D.C. 20001
and upon counsel for the District of Columbia, in the same manner, addressed to:
Bruce Brennan
Assistant Corporation Counsel, D.C.
Office of the Corporation Counsel
441 4th Street, N.W.
Suite 6-S-101
Washington, D.C. 20001
William Thomas