UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MARY HUDDLE, et al.
       Plaintiffs.

         v.                          Civil Action No. 88-3130
                                                 Judge Joyce Hens Green
RONALD WILSON REAGAN, et al.
       Defendants.

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

In light of the fact that the Court's primary -- or at least the first reason noted -- ground for denying plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction to stay criminal prosecution was that "the government states that it does not yet know whether a criminal prosecution for the alleged violation will be undertaken" (Order filed July 19, 1990), plaintiffs would like the Court to know that the government has definately decided that a criminal prosecution will be undertaken. Exhibits 1 & 2.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Concepcion Picciotto,
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Post Office Box 4931
Washington, D.C. 20008

_____________________________
William Thomas
Peace Park Antinuclear Vigil
1440 N Street, N.W. Apt. 410
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-462-0757

_____________________________
Ellen Thomas
Peace Park Antinuclear Vigil
1440 N Street, N.W. Apt. 410
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-462-0757

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I William Thomas, hereby state that, on this 18th day of August, 1990 I caused a copy of the foregoing Motion for Judicial Notice, to be hand delivered to the office of Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Martinez, at Judiciary Square, 555 4th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001.

_____________________________
William Thomas