UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 91-5304
(C.A. No. 88-3130)

MARY HUDDLE, et al.,
            Appellants,

          v.

RONALD WILSON REAGAN, et al.,
            Appellees.

CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE ll(A)(1)

Pursuant to the Court's Order of September 30, 1991, the federal appellees submit the following statement:

PARTIES AND AMICI

Appellants, plaintiffs below, are Mary Huddle, Philip Joseph, Sunrise S. Harmony, William Thomas, Ellen Thomas, Concepcion Picciotto, Scott Galindez, the "Peace Park Anti--Nuclear Vigil" and the "White House Anti-Nuclear Vigil." 1/

Federal appellees, defendants below, are former President Ronald Wilson Reagan, the Office of Management and Budget ("OMB"), the United States Secret Service, former Secretary of the Interior Donald Hodel, Department of Interior Assistant Solicitors Richard Robbins and Randolph Myers, Interior Department officials James C. Lindsey, Sandra Alley and Manus J. Fish, former Park Police Chief Lynn Herring, Chief Robert Langston, former Captain Michael Barrett, Captain Hugh Irwin and Park Police Officers Kevin Fornshill, Leslie Waite, Michelle Berkowitz and "Various Known and Unknown Government Agents."
_____________________________

1/ Plaintiffs also listed "The People of the United States" as a plaintiff in the caption of their original complaint.

Also named in the original complaint as federal defendants, but were withdrawn by plaintiffs were Interior Department officials Fran Wigglesworth and Rick Merriman.

Also named as defendants below were the District of Columbia and Captain Michael Canfield of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department.

RULINGS UNDER REVIEW

Appellants seek review of the District Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order of May 24, 1991 dismissing appellants' civil action and entering judgment in appellees' favor and the Order of June 20, 1991 denying reconsideration.

RELATED CASES

The federal appellees are unaware of any pending related cases. This appeal does, however, raise anew factual and legal issues raised by some of the same appellants in earlier cases resolved by this Court. - See Thomas v. News World Communications, 681 F.Supp 55 (D.D.C. 1988) and Thomas v. United States, 696 F.Supp. 702 (D.D.C. 1988), consolidated and affirmed on appeal, No. 88-5367 (D.C. Cir. July 17, 1989), rehrg. denied, (D.C. Cir. Sept. 26, 1989). See also, United States v. Musser, 873 F.2d 1513 (D.C. Cir.), rein. denied, 883 F.2d 84 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 518 (1989); United States v. Thomas, 864 F.2d 188 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

/s/ Jay B. Stephens
JAY B. STEPHENS
United States Attorney

/s/John D. Bates
JOHN D. BATES
Assistant United States Attorney

/s/R. Craig Lawrence
R. CRAIG LAWRENCE
Assistant United States Attorney

/s/ Michael L. Martinez
MICHAEL L. MARTINEZ
Assistant United States Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that this 30th day of October, 1991, I sent one copy of the foregoing Certificate of Counsel Pursuant to General Rule ll(a)(l) via first class U.S. mail to:

William Thomas
2817 11th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001

Victor Long
Assistant Corporation Counsel
Third Floor District Building
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004

/s/ Michael L. Martinez
MICHAEL L. MARTINEZ, DC BAR #347310
Assistant United States
Room 4810, Judiciary Center
555 Fourth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 514-7161