No. 91-5304
(C.A. No 88-3130)
Mary Huddle, et al, Appellants v. Ronald W. Reagan, et al, Appellees
rein. denied, 833 F.2d 1049 (D.C. Cir. 1987). See Huddle Mem. at 10-11. Similarly, the District Court correctly found that appellants can not support their selective enforcement claim, because there is no indication that appellants were treated differently from others who violated the regulations or that appellees' treatment of appellants was improperly motivated. See Huddle Mem. at 15-16.
/s/ Jay B. Stephens
JAY B. STEPHENS
United States Attorney/s/ John D. Bates
JOHN D. . BATES,
Assistant United States Attorney/s/ R. Craig Lawrence
R. CRAIG LAWRENCE
Assistant United States Attorney/s/ Robert L. Shapiro
ROBERT L. SHAPIRO
Assistant United States Attorney
I certify that a copy of the foregoing reply was served via first class mail to each of the following this 4th day of December, 1991:
Mary E. Huddle
804 West Pine Street
Missoula, MT 59802William Thomas
2817 11th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001Ellen Thomas
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, D.C. 20038Concepcion Picciotto
P.O. Box 4951
Washington, D.C. 20008Scott M. Galindez
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, D.C. 20038Victor Long
Assistant Corporation Counsel
1350 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.,
Room 314
Washington, D.C. 20004Robert L. Shapiro
Assistant United States Attorney
555 4th Street, N.W., 4th Floor -
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 514-7198