Concepcion Picciotto, et. al. vs. Civil Action 99cv02113 (TPJ) F I L E D United States of America, et. al.
"[e]ven where litigation poses a live controversy when filed, the [mootness]
doctrine requires a federal court to retrain from deciding it if 'events have so
transpired that the decision will neither presently affect the parties' rights nor have
a more-than-speculative chance of effecting them in the future."'
Columbian Rope Co. v. West, 142 F.3d 1313, 1316 (D.C. Cir. 1998), quoting Clarke v. United States, 915 F.2d 699, 701 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (quoting Transwestern.n Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 897 F.2d 570, 575 (D.C. Cir. 1990)); see also National Black Police Assoc., 108 F.3d at 349 (also quoting Clarke). A case becomes moot when the issues no longer are "live" or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome of the matter. Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 481 (1982).
matter is moot. See, City of Houston Texas v. Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 24 F.3d 1421, 1426 (D.C.
Cir. 1994) (case moot where Court can offer no relief that can
redress asserted grievance); see also Picciotto v. United States,
Civ. Action No. 94-1935, slip op. at 4-5 and Order at 1-2 (September
9, 1994) (attached hereto as Exhibit 2) (temporary nature of Park
closure and complaint's prayer for relief made matter moot).
Plaintiffs also refer in their Opposition to the purported conduct of Esyededeea Aesfyza in allegedly temporarily displacing plaintiffs from what they perceive to be their "customary location" in Lafayette Park. To the extent plaintiffs believe defendants somehow have acted improperly in connection with Mr. Aesfyza's alleged conduct, they can file a lawsuit challenging such action. Any such claim, however, is beyond the scope of plaintiffs' Complaint in the instant matter, and it cannot serve to resuscitate the otherwise moot claims therein. In any event, plaintiffs apparently now are re-occupying their purported ' customary location," and, therefore, any conceivable challenge in connection with Mr. Aesfyza's alleged conduct likely also is moot.
Dated: September 17th 1999
Respectfully submitted,(signed Wilhma A. Lewis)
WILMA A. LEWIS, D.C. Bar #358637
United States Attorney(signed Mark E. Nagle)
MARK E. NAGLE, D.C. Bar #416364
Assistant United States Attorney(signed Eric M. Jaffee) ,
ERIC M. KAFEE, D.C. Bar #454471
Assistant United States Attorney
Judiciary Center Building, 10th Floor
555 Fourth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 514-7153
________________________________________