PHILLY STILL FEUDING OVER FREE SPEECH
GROUPS SAY PROTESTS ARE SUPPRESSED DURING CONSTITUTION CELEBRATION
By David S. Hilzenrath
Washington Post Staff Writer
Column: THE FEDERAL PAGE
Thursday, July 16, 1987
; Page A23
As Philadelphia hosts a series of events this year commemorating the
writing of the Constitution, local and federal officials have been assailed by
a variety of political groups charging that the constitutional right of free
speech is being squelched.
"The irony is that {bicentennial planners} are throwing a birthday party
and not inviting the honored guest: the Constitution," said American Civil
Liberties Union lawyer Stefan Presser, who has represented a coalition of
activist organizations in legal action against the authorities.
Philadelphia police and the U.S. Park Service have said they acted to
ensure security and to prevent disruptions at public events, but critics
believe their purpose is to keep patriotic displays free of dissent.
The controversy began May 25, when Vice President Bush and other
dignitaries gave speeches at a ceremony in front of Independence Hall, the
Constitution's birthplace. A group called The Pledge of Resistance, which
opposes U.S. policy toward Central America, had hoped to get its message
across.
Park police barred protesters from carrying signs or leaflets past security
barriers, and people wearing antiadministration buttons, T-shirts, and arm
bands were excluded from the festivities. Anyone wearing the emblem of We the
People 200, the quasi-official organization coordinating the year-long
celebration, was admitted to the area.
Pledge of Resistance then sued the park police, the Philadelphia police,
and We the People 200.
Last week, a federal judge declared the police action at Independence
National Historic Park "a clear violation of the Constitution" and prohibited
the authorities from taking similar measures against future protesters.
"Obviously, the defendant Park Service personnel sought to prevent
plaintiffs from expressing their dissenting views in any manner which might
come to the attention of persons attending the vice president's speech, and
which might detract from the mainstream patriotism reflected by the We the
People 200 insignia," U.S. District Court Judge John P. Fullam wrote.
But Fullam's ruling did not put to rest activists' complaints about police
conduct that Presser said "smacks of totalitarianism."
The judge refused to ban police surveillance of political activists, as the
Pledge of Resistance had requested.
Apparently concerned that activists might engage in civil disobedience and
threaten the public safety today when an estimated 200 members of Congress
travel to Philadelphia for a special bicentennial observance, Philadelphia
police "infiltrated" the Pledge, according to the judge's finding. An
undercover officer secretly attended two or three of the organization's
meetings, the judge said. Other groups also allege that their activities were
monitored.
Representatives of the various groups emphasized that they are committed to
peace, but Police Commissioner Kevin M. Tucker said it was important for his
department to collect "intelligence" about a potentially difficult situation.
Hobart G. Cawood, superintendent of Independence Park, rejects the view
that the conflict over freedom of speech and assembly has subverted the spirit
of the bicentennial.
"It's the Constitution in action," Cawood said.
Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington
Post and may not include subsequent corrections.
Return to Search Results