UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
William Thomas, et. al. | C.A. No. 94-2742
Plaintiffs pro se, | Judge Charles R. Richey
The United States, et. al. |
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND SUGGESTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS
While preparing a Response to Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, for Summary Judgment, on the facts
and law presented in defendants motion it became apparent that plaintiffs are more
likely candidates for summary disposition than defendants.
Hence, plaintiffs respectfully move this Court to enter Summary Judgment in
A Memorandum in Support and Statement of Genuine Issues of Fact Not in
Dispute accompany this Motion.
A proposed Order is attached.
Respectfully submitted this 7th day of July, 1995.
2817 11th Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby state that, on July 7, 1995, I delivered a copy of the foregoing Plaintiffs'
Motion for Summary Judgment, and suggestion for Rule 11 Sanctions, and Statement
of Genuine Issues of Facts Not in Dispute upon the office of the United States
Attorney, 555 4th Street NW, Washington, D.C. ROOM 10-808, by mail.