Certificate Required by Rule 28(A)(1)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No.95-5338

September Term, 1995
USDC No. 95cv01018
William Thomas, et al., Appellants

v.

United States of America, et al., Appellees

CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY RULE 28(A)(1)
OF THE GENERAL RULES OF THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

The undersigned, counsel of record, as plaintiff pro se in the District Court, certifies that the following listed parties appeared below:

PLAINTIFFS
William Thomas,
Ellen Thomas,
Concepcion Picciotto,

All plaintiffs appeared pro se, and agree on the position that the District Court's Orders of April 12, 1995 and August 23, 1995 are in error and should be reversed.

DEFENDANTS
United States of America,
U.S.Secret Service,
District of Columbia,
Captain Michael Radzilowski, D.C. Metropolitian Police.

The United States and Secret Service were represented by the United States Attorney's Office, Captain Radzilowski and the District of Columbia were represented

1

by the D.C. Corporation Counsel's Office. The undersigned assumes, Appellees agree on the position that the District Court's Order of August 31, 1995 is correct and should be upheld.

These representations are made in order that judges of this court, inter alia, may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal.

Respectfully submitted this 30th day of October, 1995,

__________________________
William Thomas, Appellant, pro se
2817 11th Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20038
202-462-0757

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On October 30, 1995, I caused a copy of the Copies of the Certificate Required by Rule 28(A)(1) to be served upon the office of the Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, Appellate Division, at 555 4th Street NW, Washington, D.C., by first class U.S. mail postage prepaid.