Therefore, because it is unnecessary and would obviously
burden the specific rights which it purports to be "not intended to interfere with," it appears that the proposed rule is nothing more than a regulatory attempt to negate constitutionally protected rights under the guise of protecting "aesthetics."
NAME ADDRESS (Write legibly please!)
SAVE THE 16T AMENDMENT COMMITTEE, POB 27217,
Washington, DC 20038
1997 Inaugural | Park Closures | Pennsylvania Ave. Closure
Peace Park | Proposition One
Legal Overview | Regulations