USDC Cr. No. 84-3552
THOMAS v. REAGAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WILLIAM THOMAS, et al
Plaintiff Pro Se
versus CA 84-3552
Judge Louis Oberdorfer
UNITED STATES, et al
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO THE MAGISTRATE'S
MEMORANDUM OPINIONS, REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT OF JAMES C. LINDSEY,
AND DEFENDANT CANFIELD
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), plaintiffs hereby move for an
extension of time up to and including Monday, January 5, 1987 in
which to file an appropriate response to the Memorandum Opinions
Reports, & Recommendations on the Motions for Summary Judgment of
James C. Lindsey and Defendant Canfield, filed on December 15,
1986, by U.S. Magistrate Arthur L. Burnett.
The reasons for the delay in filing these responses are more
fully set forth in the Memorandum which accompanys this motion.
A proposed Order is attached.
Respectfully submitted this 29th day
of December, 1986.
William Thomas, Plaintiff Pro Se
1440 N Street NW, #410
Washington, DC 20005
Case Listing --- Proposition One ---- Peace Park