THOMAS v. REAGAN

USDC Cr. No. 84-3552

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WILLIAM THOMAS, et al    
     Plaintiff Pro Se    
                         
versus                          CA 84-3552
                                Judge Louis Oberdorfer
UNITED STATES, et al     
     Defendants

FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE
TO THE COURT'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL

The federal defendants hereby advise the Court, in response to the Court's July 29, 1988 Order, that they have no objection to the Court taking judicial notice of the documents attached to that Order, which were requested from and supplied by counsel for the federal defendants.

Respectfully submitted,

(signed)

JAY B. STEPHENS, DC BAR 1177840

United States Attorney

(sgined)

MICHAEL L. MARTINEZ, DC BAR #347310

Assistant United States Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that this 5th day of August, 1988. I sent one copy of the foregoing Federal defendants' Response to the Court's Notice to Counselr via first class U.S. mail to:

Mark A. Venuti, Esquire

3600 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20007

Beverly Burke, Esquire

Assistant Corporation Counsel

3rd Floor District Building

1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

William Thomas

1440 N Street, N.W. #410

Washington, D.C. 20004

Michael L. MARTIINEZ, DC BAR #347310

Assistant United States Attorney

Room 4822 Judiciary Center

555 Fourth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

(202) 272-9258

Contents

Case Listing --- Proposition One ---- Peace Park