INDEX OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT -------------------------------------------------- 1

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ---------------------------- 2

III. DISCUSSION ------------------------------------------------------------------ 3

A. THE APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS ------------------------------ 4

1. MOTION TO DISMISS -------------------------------------------- 5
2. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ------------------------- 5

B. PLAINTIFF'S ARREST --------------------------------------------------- 6

1. FACTS -------------------------------------------------------------- 6
2. FACTUAL SUBTERFUGE? ---------------------------------------- 6

(a). "Good Faith" ------------------------------------------------- 6
(i). A Couple of Genuine Issues ---------------------------- 9

(b). Actual Reality ------------------------------------------------ 9
(i). A Lawful Order? --------------------------------------- 10

C. WELL-ESTABLISHED RIGHT ------------------------------------------- 11

1. REASONABLE WORDS MUST HAVE SOME MEANING ------ 12

(a). A "SIGN" IS A "SIGN" ------------------------------------- 13
(b). NO "OBSTRUCTION" IS NOT "AN OBSTRUCTION" -- 14
(c). "BECAUSE I SAID SO," IS NOT "A LAWFUL ORDER -- 15
(d). "DEPRIVATION" IS "DEPRIVATION" -------------------- 15
(e). COSMIC MOTIVES --------------------------------------- 16
(i) Security ------------------------------------------------ 16
(AA). Procedural Subterfuge? ---------------------- 18
(ii) Freedom of Thought and Expression ------------------- 19
(iii) The Conflict? ------------------------------------------ 20

D. CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS ------------------------------------------- 21
1. THE FIRST AMENDMENT ---------------------------------------- 22
2. THE FIFTH AMENDMENT ---------------------------------------- 22
3. THE NINTH AMENDMENT --------------------------------------- 22

E. BIVENS CLAIMS --------------------------------------------------------- 23
1. JURISDICTION ---------------------------------------------------- 23
2. DEFENDANT RADZILWOSKI ------------------------------------ 23
3. FEDERAL DEFENDANTS ----------------------------------------- 27
4. A MEETING OF THE MINDS ------------------------------------- 27

G. CLAIMS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ----------------------------------- 29

H. THE GENIUINE ISSUE OF VACUUMS -------------------------------- 30
1. SECURITY UBER ALLES ----------------------------------------- 32
(a) OTHER CONCERNS RAISED BY DEFENDANTS'
ACTIONS ------------------------------------------------------ 32

2. RESTRICTING ACCESS TO THE SYMBOL OF OUR FREE AND DEMOCRATIC NATION -------------------------------------------- 33
(a) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY -------------------- 34
(b) RIPE CONCRETE BARRIERS ----------------------------- 35

3. LEGAL SUBTERFUGE? ------------------------------------------- 37
(a). CLOSING PENNSYLVNIA AVENUE ------------------- 37
(b). MISLEADING MAPS ------------------------------------- 37

I. WHO'S PLAYING A GAME? -------------------------------------------- 38
J. PLAINTIFF'S CONFESSION -------------------------------------------- 39
K. YELLING "FIRE" -------------------------------------------------------- 41
L. A FOOL FOR A LAWYER? --------------------------------------------- 42

IV. CONCLUSION ---------------------------------------------------------------- 44